<![CDATA[Anne Yumi Kobori - Theatre Blog]]>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 20:31:06 -0800Weebly<![CDATA[The Color-blind Casting Debate]]>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 20:50:45 GMThttp://www.anneyumikobori.com/theatre-blog/the-color-blind-casting-debateAs an Asian-American actor, I am always looking for companies and directors that will break out of the usual mold and consider me for a part that is not traditionally cast as Asian. Otherwise I would be stuck in a forever revolving repertory of Miss Saigon, Flower Drum Song, and The King and I. To their credit, many Bay Area Companies, particularly Shakespeare companies, are breaking out of traditional casting. Colorblind casting, the practice of casting an actor regardless of race or ethnicity, has long been a subject of debate. On the one hand, colorblind casting offers more job opportunities to minorities in theatre. But playwright August Wilson opposed colorblind casting because to put a black actor in a role about the white experience denies the black actor their own cultural experience, and assimilates them into the dominant culture. So how can an ethnic actor get onstage without compromising their integrity or ideals?


I believe that the decision hinges on what serves the play. The play's the thing. If the writer has specified an ethnicity for a particular role, and the plot or content of the play hinges on that character being that ethnicity, then it should not be cast colorblind. For example, to cast a Latino in the role of Tevye in Fiddler on the Roof, a play about the Jewish experience, would not serve the play. Conversely, to cast a white man in the role of Othello would also not serve the play. It is true of course that directors develop certain artistic concepts which oppose the author's original specifications. In that case, it is a totally different play than the original which the director is presenting, and casting methods may change accordingly.  

But regardless of how far you take colorblind casting, the reality is that new plays must be written which encompass the black, or the Latino, or the Asian experience. New companies must be formed which are dedicated to the honest depiction of minority cultures onstage, and to producing the writers who hail from those cultures. 
It is crucial that the demographic of the actors onstage come closer to matching the demographic of the audience's community. Not only for the honest portrayal of  all cultures in America, but for the sake of ticket sales. Who besides the white bourgeoisie wants to see plays about the white bourgeoisie? ]]><![CDATA[Making New Work : Charisma 2014]]>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 20:12:04 GMThttp://www.anneyumikobori.com/theatre-blog/making-new-work-charisma-2014Picture
Charisma at Santa Clara University: six undergraduate theatre majors are given a weekend beach retreat, an almost unlimited budget, and 4 months of rehearsal to create a performance piece about art and spirituality. In the theatre world, that is a goldmine of opportunity and resources. But where do you go from there? 

The first thing we found was that we had too much money. That seems impossible. But impacting, innovative theatre does not need floor to ceiling sets, animal puppets, or fog machines. (We did want a fog machine at one point.) There was something both vulnerable and accessible about a bare stage and simple costumes. Instead of distracting, or entertaining the audience with special effects, we focused on communicating the messages of the piece. That communication took several forms. One of the main forms was direct address. We took that a step further and created what I call interactive monologues. One person does the majority of speaking, using the audience and other actors as points of inspiration or connection. I have often found direct address to be lacking in subtlety and abundant in cliche. However, the themes of Charisma - connection, identity, sharing stories, and fears about the future - particularly lent themselves to direct address The audience, many of them college students, had a personal connection to the material presented. 

What was unique about Charisma was that we weren't playing fictional characters, but rather heightened versions of ourselves. The bare stage reflected the baring of our own personal thoughts, fears, and hopes for life after college. Current college students in the audience were able to relate to the experiences we portrayed onstage, and adults were able to reflect back on their own experiences and the experiences of their children. Multiple students approached me and my cast members after the performance, some crying, some laughing, all appreciative of the truthfulness of the performance and the content. One of the audience members, currently a teacher at the university, stated, "I had heard these themes throughout my time in education, but this show shed a new light on them that I hadn't heard before." Another confided, "It was really comforting, on some level, to know that you are all still struggling with some of the same things I struggled with when I was in college, and that you're trying to figure out how to turn your struggles and challenges into opportunities to not only make your life better, but the lives of those around you as well."

Live theatre is unique in its ability to create a powerful, personal connection between performers and audience. The creators of new work in theatre must identify their audience, find the possible points of emotional and contextual connection, and commiserate, educate, and illuminate. In a world where social media dominates public attention, live theatre holds a precarious position. Integration of media and technology into theatre is a bold and necessary step forward. But a return to the simple, the visceral, and the personal is also necessary. The beauty of theatre is an ephemeral beauty, and that is what makes it precious. The experience of theatre is of watching real, live you-could-reach-out-and-touch-them people saying words that will never be said in the same way again. And yet the words, the messages, the performances, stay with the people in the audience who have experienced them. Charisma 2014* was an original work of theatre, music, and dance, which grew from intense trust and collaboration and existed for three nights of performance. The connection formed between actor and audience will endure. The play will not. That is live theatre. 

© 2014 by Anne Yumi Kobori

*Charisma 2014 featured the work and performances of Laurel Bettis, Rachel Bove, Tennyson Jones, Danielle Kaigler, Anne Yumi Kobori, and Gavin Mueller. It was directed by Gavin Mueller and advised by Carolyn Silberman.
]]>